|
The continuum-of-care services for at-risk and delinquent girls component focuses on providing comprehensive gender-specific prevention, intervention, and treatment services to young women, along with case management and followup. Dryfoos (1990) notes that girls with low basic academic skills are five to seven times more likely to become teen mothers. Acoca and Austin (1996) found that about three-quarters of female offenders were exposed to violence as children. Other risk factors include association with an antisocial peer group (Hugo and Rutherford, 1992), dropping out of school (Snyder and Sickmund, 1995), substance abuse (Bergsmann, 1994; Dryfoos, 1990), and sexual abuse (Acoca and Austin, 1996).
Numerous studies suggest that as many as 10 percent of young females are at extremely high risk for serious criminal activity (Dryfoos, 1990; Reiss and Roth, 1993; Wilson and Howell, 1993). Between 1983 and 1993, the number of females involved in the juvenile justice system grew disproportionately compared with males, including faster increases in the number of person and delinquency offenses (Girls Incorporated, 1996). By 1994, girls constituted one-quarter of all juvenile arrests (Poe-Yamagata and Butts, 1996). Female juvenile offenders exhibit many of the same risk factors common to delinquent males, including physical or emotional abuse, low economic status, and poor parenting (Bergsmann, 1988; Crawford, 1988; Sarri, 1988, in Bergsmann, 1989), but tend to receive fewer services, including fewer preventive services (U.S. General Accounting Office, 1995). Burt, Resnick, and Matheson (1992) report that early identification and treatment, long-term program commitment, individualized attention, skill enhancement, life options, vocational orientation, and greater community involvement can increase girls’ protective factors. This component is intended to provide services that meet the unique emotional and developmental needs of young women. A maximum of $120,000 per year is available to each SafeFutures site under Part C of the JJDP Act. The anticipated gender-specific programming may include health education (e.g., an introduction to female anatomy and self-care, basics on appropriate prenatal care, and information about safe sex), health services, parenting skills, or childcare services for girls who are parents. It also may include activities supporting basic education, job training, life management skills, and personal growth focused on developing a more positive self-image and greater sense of responsibility. As noted previously, funds for girls’ programming were sometimes combined with funds from other components. Contra Costa County and Seattle, for example, combined funds from the juvenile mentoring program and the services for at-risk and delinquent girls components to support mentoring programs targeted to girls, and one of Seattle’s mental health programs (Sibling Support, discussed previously) also targets this group. It should be kept in mind that the programs specifically identified as serving at-risk girls were not the only sources of gender-specific programming. The demonstration sites incorporated gender-specific programming in other components (such as afterschool programs) to varying degrees.
Seattle’s Cambodian Girls Group (CGG) is an example of one of the more comprehensive gender-specific programs. It is also an example of cultural competency in programming.
Boston finalized its girls’ program model in the latter part of year 2, when it subcontracted with an existing agency that provides a range of gender-specific services.
|