|
Introduction
This Bulletin is part of OJJDP's
Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grants (JAIBG) Best Practices Series. The
basic premise underlying the JAIBG program, initially funded in fiscal year 1998, is
that young people who violate the law need to be held accountable for their offenses if society
is to improve the quality of life in the Nation's communities. Holding a juvenile
offender "accountable" in the juvenile justice
system means that once the juvenile is determined to have committed law-violating
behavior, by admission or adjudication, he or she
is held responsible for the act through consequences or sanctions, imposed pursuant
to law, that are proportionate to the offense. Consequences or sanctions that are
applied swiftly, surely, and consistently, and are graduated to provide appropriate and
effective responses to varying levels of offense seriousness and offender chronicity,
work best in preventing, controlling, and reducing further law violations.
In an effort to help States and units of local government develop programs in the 12
purpose areas established for JAIBG funding, Bulletins in this series are designed to
present the most up-to-date knowledge to juvenile justice policymakers, researchers, and
practitioners about programs and approaches that
hold juvenile offenders accountable for
their behavior. An indepth description of the JAIBG program and a list of the 12
program purpose areas appear in the overview
Bulletin for this series.
Youth violence increased dramatically between the mid-1980's and
mid-1990's (Lattimore, Visher, and Linster, 1995), and public concern about youth
crime -- especially youth violence -- has risen accordingly (Reiss and Roth, 1993;
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1992; Rosenberg, O'Carroll, and Powell, 1992).
In the wake of these problems and concerns, juvenile justice policy has
become decidedly more conservative (Cullen, 1995). Legislators seeking to
reduce crime, protect society, and hold offenders accountable for their actions have
advocated for a "get tough on crime"
policy (Benekos and Merlo, 1995; Langan, 1991). This movement has been extended
to juvenile justice (Moon, Applegate, and Latessa, 1997).
Three of the twelve program purpose areas in the JAIBG program focus on
enhancing local prosecutors' abilities to address
juvenile crime in their jurisdictions. This Bulletin addresses two of these areas:
Purpose Area 4. Hire
additional prosecutors so that more cases involving violent juvenile
offenders can be prosecuted and backlogs reduced.
Purpose Area 6. Fund
technology, equipment, and training to assist prosecutors in identifying and
expediting the prosecution of violent juvenile offenders.
Purpose Area 5, which provides funding to enable prosecutors to
specifically address drug, gang, and youth violence problems more
effectively, is discussed in another Bulletin in
this series, Enabling Prosecutors To Address Drug, Gang, and Youth Violence.
Enhancing Prosecutors' Ability To Combat and Prevent Juvenile Crime in Their Jurisdictions |
JAIBG Bulletin
· December 1999
|
|