Most arrested juveniles were referred to court

In most States, some persons under age 18 are, due to their age or by statutory exclusion, under the jurisdiction of the criminal justice system. For arrested persons under age 18 and under the original jurisdiction of their State’s juvenile justice system, the FBI’s UCR Program monitors what happens as a result of the arrest. This is the only instance in the UCR Program in which the statistics on arrests coincide with State variations in the legal definition of a juvenile.

In 2000, 20% of arrests involving youth eligible in their State for processing in the juvenile justice system were handled within law enforcement agencies, 71% were referred to juvenile court, and 7% were referred directly to criminal court. The others were referred to a welfare agency or to another police agency. The proportion of arrests sent to juvenile court has increased gradually from 1990 to 2000 (64% to 71%). In 2000, the proportion of juvenile arrests sent to juvenile court was similar in cities (70%), suburban areas (70%), and rural counties (71%).

Among the four Violent Crime Index offenses, only aggravated assault had a juvenile arrest rate in 2000 that was not at its lowest level in two decades

Four line graphs showing arrests for Violent Crime Index offenses per 100,000 juveniles ages 10–17 in 1980–2000. Murder

  • The juvenile arrest rate for murder peaked in 1993. In that year, there were about 3,800 arrests of persons under age 18 for murder.
  • In the 7 years prior to this peak, the juvenile arrest rate for murder more than doubled.
  • In the 7 years following the peak, the juvenile arrest rate for murder fell 74%, dropping to its lowest level in more than two decades and erasing all of the earlier growth.

Four line graphs showing arrests for Violent Crime Index offenses per 100,000 juveniles ages 10–17 in 1980–2000.Forcible Rape

  • The juvenile arrest rate for forcible rape did not vary as much as the rates for the other violent crimes over the period of 1980 to 2000, although it did follow the general pattern of growth and decline over the period.
  • The juvenile arrest rate for forcible rape increased 44% between 1980 and 1991 and then fell; by 2000, it was 13% less than the 1980 rate, at its lowest level in at least two decades.

Four line graphs showing arrests for Violent Crime Index offenses per 100,000 juveniles ages 10–17 in 1980–2000.Robbery

  • The juvenile arrest rate for robbery declined during much of the 1980s, falling 30% between 1980 and 1988.
  • The juvenile arrest rate for robbery increased 70% between the low year of 1988 and the peak years of 1994 and 1995, to a level 19% more than the 1980 rate.
  • Between the peak years and 2000, the juvenile arrest rate for robbery declined substantially (57%), falling to its lowest level in two decades.

Four line graphs showing arrests for Violent Crime Index offenses per 100,000 juveniles ages 10–17 in 1980–2000. Aggravated Assault

  • The juvenile arrest rate for aggravated assault doubled between 1980 and 1994. Its increase between the mid-1980s and the mid-1990s generally paralleled the increases for murder and robbery.
  • Unlike the juvenile arrest rate trends for murder and robbery, however, the decline in the juvenile arrest rate for aggravated assault between 1994 and 2000 did not erase the increase that began in the mid-1980s. While the juvenile arrest rate for aggravated assault fell 30% between 1994 and 2000, the 2000 rate was still 42% more than the 1980 level.

Data source: Analysis of arrest data from the FBI and population data from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. [See data source note for detail.]


Juvenile arrest rate trends for the four Property Crime Index offenses show very different patterns over the 1980—2000 period

Four line graphs showing arrests for Property Crime Index offenses per 100,000 juveniles ages 10–17 in 1980–2000.Burglary

  • Unlike the juvenile arrest rates for any of the other Index offenses, the rate for burglary declined consistently and substantially between 1980 and 2000. Over this period, the burglary arrest rate was cut by nearly two-thirds (63%).
  • In 1980, there were an estimated 230,500 juvenile arrests for burglary; by 2000, this figure had fallen to 95,800.
  • Between 1991 and 2000, the number of arrests for burglary declined substantially for both juveniles and adults (38% and 36%, respectively).

Four line graphs showing arrests for Property Crime Index offenses per 100,000 juveniles ages 10–17 in 1980–2000.Larceny-Theft

  • The relatively large volume of larceny-theft arrests ensures that the Property Crime Index arrest trends will reflect the larceny-theft trends. Therefore, it should be recognized that the juvenile Property Crime Index arrest trends may not (and in this period did not) reflect the juvenile arrest trends for the other crimes in the Index.
  • The juvenile arrest rate for larceny-theft remained relatively constant between 1980 and 1997, then fell by almost one-third (29%) in the brief period between 1997 and 2000.

Four line graphs showing arrests for Property Crime Index offenses per 100,000 juveniles ages 10–17 in 1980–2000.Motor Vehicle Theft

  • After falling between 1980 and 1983, the juvenile arrest rate for motor vehicle theft soared, increasing nearly 138% between 1983 and 1990.
  • After the 1990 peak, the juvenile arrest rate for motor vehicle theft declined both consistently and substantially, so that by 2000 the rate was just 10% above its lowest level of 1983 and 54% below its 1990 peak.
  • Between 1991 and 2000, the number of arrests for motor vehicle theft declined 51% for juveniles and 23% for adults.

Four line graphs showing arrests for Property Crime Index offenses per 100,000 juveniles ages 10–17 in 1980–2000.Arson

  • After being relatively stable for most of the 1980s, the juvenile arson arrest rate grew 56% between 1987 and 1994. The rate then declined each year between 1994 and 2000, falling 30% from the 1994 peak and returning to the level of 1988.
  • With the exception of running away from home and curfew and loitering law violations (crimes for which only juveniles can be arrested), arson is the offense with the greatest proportion of juvenile arrests. In the 1980s, an annual average of 41% of all arson arrests involved juveniles. In the 1990s, the percentage grew to 50%; in 2000, it was 53%.

Data source: Analysis of arrest data from the FBI and population data from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. [See data source note for detail.]


Trends in juvenile arrest rates for weapons law violations and for murder were similar between 1980 and 2000

Line graph showing arrests for weapons law violations per 100,000 juveniles ages 10–17 in 1980–2000.
  • The juvenile arrest rates for weapons law violations and for murder more than doubled between 1987 and the peak year of 1993.
  • After 1993, both rates fell. The juvenile arrest rate for murder fell 74% between 1993 and 2000. The arrest rate for weapons law violations was cut in half, falling 48% and returning to the 1987 level.

Data source: Analysis of arrest data from the FBI and population data from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. [See data source note for detail.]


The juvenile arrest rate for drug abuse violations soared in the mid-1990s

Line graph showing arrests for drug abuse violations per 100,000 juveniles ages 10–17 in 1980–2000.
  • Between 1980 and 1993, the juvenile arrest rate remained within a limited range. Between 1993 and 1997, however, the rate grew 78%. By 2000, the rate had fallen somewhat (14%) from its 1997 high.
  • During the period from 1991 to 2000, juvenile arrests for drug abuse violations increased 145%, while adult arrests grew 42%.

Data source: Analysis of arrest data from the FBI and population data from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. [See data source note for detail.]


Unlike juvenile arrest rates for other violent crimes, the rate for simple assault did not decline substantially in the latter part of the 1990s

Line graph showing arrests for simple assault per 100,000 juveniles ages 10–17 in 1980–2000.
  • The juvenile arrest rate for simple assault increased substantially between the early 1980s and the late 1990s—more than 150% between 1983 and 1997.
  • The rate fell slightly (6%) between 1997 and 2000, remaining in 2000 near its historically high levels.

Data source: Analysis of arrest data from the FBI and population data from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. [See data source note for detail.]


The juvenile arrest rate for vandalism in 2000 was at its lowest level in two decades

Line graph showing arrests for vandalism per 100,000 juveniles ages 10–17 in 1980–2000.
  • The juvenile arrest rate for vandalism rose 27% between 1988 and 1994, its peak year in the 1980–2000 period.
  • Between 1994 and 2000, the rate declined 31%, erasing all of the earlier growth.

Data source: Analysis of arrest data from the FBI and population data from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. [See data source note for detail.]




Previous Contents Next

Line
Juvenile Arrests 2000 OJJDP Bulletin November 2002